[EDI-L Mailing List Archive Home] [Message List] [Reply To This Message]

RE: ebXML & Microsoft's Business Collaboration Framework

From: "Dwight Andrews" <andrews_dwight@...>
Date: Wed Feb 25, 2004  8:32 pm
Subject: RE: [EDI-L] ebXML & Microsoft's Business Collaboration Framework
I think the article was staged to get publicity for Cefact and ebXML.
Nothing more.


>From: >To: Dwight Andrews < >CC: >Subject: RE: [EDI-L] ebXML & Microsoft's Business Collaboration Framework
>Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 11:09:06 -0500 (EST)
>
>On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Dwight Andrews wrote:
>
> > Now I don't know if Microsoft was trying to buy Ray and Klaus. And I
> > don't know if they even "turned their back on ebXML". What I do know is
> > that they received a lot of publicity out of the article.
>
>Dwight,
>
>It could be that I'm not wise to the ways of the world, but what confuses
>me most is what kind of advantage greater use of Microsoft's BCF standards
>could provide them. I expect that these new BCF standards will remain
>free for use without royalty fees, just as is ebXML. I also can't imagine
>Microsoft using their embrace-and-extend approach to help lock-in users to
>a single eBusiness solution with them spearheading standards development
>from the get-go. What are your thoughts on their motivation with this?
>
>Ultimately, I wonder how this will affect others' support for ebXML stuff.
>
> > >I'm not sure it should be that puzzling. Seems to me (I don't recall
> > >the details too clearly) that just after the ebXML specifications were
> > >finalized, that IBM did it's best to distance itself from ebXML by
> > >helping to start up WS-I and carry the Web Services banner.
>
> > >Frankly, this rings of the aspect of standards that annoys me the most.
> > >Politics and competition. They say the beauty of standards is that
> > >there are so many to choose from. That's because, when you get right
> > >down to it, there isn't a single business that's in it for altruistic
> > >reasons...they're looking for their niche, their advantage. And if
> > >that means changing sides or doing end runs around the other guy, then
> > >that's what they're going to do. On the other hand, the fun part is
> > >watching everybody do the next big thing gavotte every 6-18 months.
>
>-- _
>__ __ ___ _| | William R. Lorenz < >\ V V / '_| | EC/EDI, Inc. <http://www.ecediinc.com/>
> \./\./|_| |_| EDI Outsourcing; VAN Services; B2B E-Commerce
>

_________________________________________________________________
Store more e-mails with MSN Hotmail Extra Storage – 4 plans to choose from!
http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200362ave/direct/01/




 
EDI to XML Mapping for EDIFACT/X12 Convert EDIFACT/X12 Schemas to XML Schema Legacy Data Conversion Tools Access Relational Data as XML Visual XSLT and XQuery Mapping Tools Simplify EDI Data Integration with Stylus Studio XML Enterprise Suite - Free Download!
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2007 All Rights Reserved.