|
[EDI-L Mailing List Archive Home]
[Message List]
[Reply To This Message]
997 reporting of a segment out of order
Looking for opinions to help settle a debate:
If transaction set definition contained the following (indentation
represents loop contents):
ST
SGA segment a
SGB segment b, so on....
LOOPA
SGC
SGD
LOOPB
SGE
SGF
SE
If the input data consisted of:
ST
SGA
SGB
LOOPA
SGC
SGF <<< invalid placement
LOOPB
SGE
SE
Would you expect the 997 to report:
AK3*SGF*6*LOOPA*7 Invalid Placement SGF found in LoopA
or
AK3*SGF*6*LOOPB*7 Invalid Placement LoopB/SGF (assumes that if
transaction set definition contained multiple SGFs that you can
identify that this SGF is the one allowed for use in LoopB)
or
AK3*SGF*6*LOOPA*2 Unexpected SGF found in Loop A
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Subscribe in XML format
| RSS 2.0 |
|
| Atom 0.3 |
|
|
Cart
