|
[EDI-L Mailing List Archive Home]
[Message List]
[Reply To This Message]
RE: Response to 830
It also depends on what industry you are in. If you're in automotive, the
correct response to the 830 is merely getting the items being ordered to the
shipto on the dates specified - no 'negotiation' necessary! The whole process
revolves around the assumption that you as the supplier do as you are told in
the 830 transaction. In other industries, it sounds like it's more acceptable
to confirm back with one of the standard confirmation messages, like the 855 or
865.
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Mattias [mailto:
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2004 4:23 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [EDI-L] Response to 830
> What would be the response document for the 830 (Planning and Schedule
forecast with Release capability)? For the 850 you have
the >855. I was wondering if there is something similar for the 830.
I have one client where we receive the 830, and we generate the '865 Seller
Initiated PO Change Acknowledgement" against the
'blanket' PO to which the '830' refers.
Although I think an 855 would be a good choice too, perhaps using code "04"
(change) in BAK01, again against the blanket PO number
referenced in the '830'.
Since you are already creating and partner is already receiving 855s (I infer
this from your note), this might be the easiest for
both of you to implement.
Michael Mattias
Tal Systems, Inc.
Racine WI
.
Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>,
<JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC>
Access the list online at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L
Yahoo! Groups Links
|
 |
Subscribe in XML format
| RSS 2.0 |
|
| Atom 0.3 |
|
|
Cart
