[EDI-L Mailing List Archive Home] [Message List] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML Hierarchy Question

From: Chris Johnson <chrisj@...>
Date: Wed Jan 26, 2005  7:01 pm
Subject: Re: [EDI-L] XML Hierarchy Question
Quoted text is from
< , by
>Should you build an XML document with an implied hierarchy (i.e. detail
>must be a child of header) or should you build it flat (i.e. detail and
>header at the same level? Why would one method be better than the
>other?

All the XML documents I can remember seeing had an explicit hierarchy.
Having one which mimicked a 'joined table' flat file would only be an
advantage if you were writing a quick and dirty utility to transform
between it and a flat file. Perhaps I have misunderstood the question?

Regards
Chris

--
Chris Johnson mobile:+44 (0)7785 302122
EDIMatrix Ltd work: 0845 126 0680 or +44 20 8559 2454
fax: +44 (0)20 8559 2497
EDI website http://www.edimatrix.co.uk



 
EDI to XML Mapping for EDIFACT/X12 Convert EDIFACT/X12 Schemas to XML Schema Legacy Data Conversion Tools Access Relational Data as XML Visual XSLT and XQuery Mapping Tools Simplify EDI Data Integration with Stylus Studio XML Enterprise Suite - Free Download!
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2007 All Rights Reserved.