|
[EDI-L Mailing List Archive Home]
[Message List]
[Reply To This Message]
Re: <ADVOCACY> Why I Don't Like XML
Earl, I thought Walmart had something to do with the EAN.UCC standards
and UCCNET for data synchronization. I could swear XML had something to
do with this stuff. Isn't this going anywhere?
William J. Kammerer
Novannet
Columbus, OH 43221-3859 . USA
+1 (614) 487-0320
----- Original Message -----
From: "Earl Wertheimer" <
To: <
Sent: Monday, 07 February, 2005 09:43 AM
Subject: Re: [EDI-L] <ADVOCACY> Why I Don't Like XML
William
> Earl, don't look to the 800-lb. gorillas to initiate revolutions. It's
> unlikely a gorilla would exclusively mandate a gussied-up UML-modeled
> core-componentized ISO 11179 compliant XML based e-business standard.
I agree, but the 800 lb gorilla (Walmart) had a lot of force in the
marketplace.
When Walmart pushed Bisynch modems, their trading partners had no
choice. When Walmart pushed AS2, again the trading partners had no
choice.
They make these decisions because they are better economically FOR THEM,
not to advance the technology.
Any new technology must show good economic benefits, or it will be
delegated to some niche.
I don't see those benefits with XML or any of the other acronyms being
thrown around recently.
Show us the benefits... You'll see the converts ;-)
> Medicare is another case in point. That's why HIPAA's TCS Rule
> strictly
> mandates - for the most part - crusty, old X12 EDI for claims,
> payments
> and whatnot. Is that why Martin Morrison is stuck with abominations
> like
> 300 megabyte 837 Healthcare Claim transactions? And to this day, 9
> years
> after HIPAA was promulgated, Medicare itself still can't conform
> completely to the "standard" HIPAA EDI guidelines.
Wasn't the main culprit the government who mandated HIPAA?
In that case, the economic benefits are _not_ considerations. ;-)
Earl Wertheimer
http://www.spe-edi.com
|
|
Subscribe in XML format
| RSS 2.0 |
|
| Atom 0.3 |
|
|
Cart
