|
[EDI-L Mailing List Archive Home]
[Message List]
[Reply To This Message]
RE: <Misc> Current Matrix of VANS - What's Obsolete?

W3C// DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
James,
Funny that, come to think of it, I have a telephone in my office, at home, and in my pocket (all signs of an adaptable technology). I think it was first introduced in 1875, and is more popular now than at it's birth. Some technology get better with age.
I agree with you that AS2 provides some amazing benefits for the right-sized company. I don't necessarily agree that all businesses will benefit. Small businesses can't necessarily hire a full time network administrator to keep the HTTP servers up, and if they could, that administrator's one year salary could equal 15 years of VAN fees (if you're using the right VAN). This is where I see the VA part of VAN still shining brightly. But Cleo LexiCom and iSoft are nice plays that help scoop more of these smaller businesses into the exciting world of Internet exchanges of EDI and XML. And they do have a nice reseller community that could mitigate some of the network admin costs associated with an on-your-own exchange of transactions. Should be interesting to watch the continued shaping of market forces on this ever-evolving industry we love.
Cheers,
Nathan Camp
Softshare
Just to add a spin to this; VAN EDI technology is well over 20 years old now. With the rise of the Internet, AS2 (see other recent thread) and other Internet communication technologies provide secure, authenticated ways of exchanging standards compliant data that replace the obsolete VAN methodology. With a similar (or lower) investment you get a communication ability with no VAN fees. Adding work flows, event driven processes and exception management to the data exchanged increases the value of electronic data exponentially. Can't do that with the old VAN mail box model, doesn't work. A few years back there was a hue and cry that "EDI is dead" this of course was untrue. EDI will always exist in some standards compliant format however what is happening is the death of VAN's. Obsolete technology & process. It was great when there were no other options. Think about it, do you have any piece of technology or software in your company that is over 20 years old? (Other than in the display case) One of the reasons IBM sold it's VAN to GXS is because the market is shrinking. GXS continues to try to offer a hybrid VAN / Web EDI solution to maintain their VAN cash cow but emerging markets like China refuse to do VAN EDI and are going with Internet based solutions. VAN's are loathe to go to a pure Internet offering because it doesn't have the reoccurring revenue stream traditional VAN EDI has. They will resist and milk the cow till it goes dry. I can hear the argument "but the big guys only do VAN EDI," not true. Big companies need a significant portion of their suppliers connected for APS and SCM solutions to be accurate. It used to be good enough to just have your Tier 1 suppliers on EDI, no more, competition is too fierce. Small and medium companies won't do VAN EDI due to the cost & technical challenges involved. The trend for Internet based solutions continues to grow and the big guys in most verticals have pilots or active programs to phase out their VAN EDI connections over time. Save a copy of that VAN list, Tier 1 or not it will be a collectors item in the not too distant future. Take a snap shot & stick it in the box with your museum pictures of Dinosaurs. :-) James Hatcher Seeburger At 01:20 PM 3/22/2005 -0500, Glen Haywood wrote:
In the good old days, Value Added Networks (VANs) maintained a pretty exclusive "club membership" so as to protect themselves and their customers' data. Tier 1 VANs signed and maintained quite extensive Interconnect Agreements that laid out terms of interchange of data including but not limited to mailbagging, traceability of files, minimum volume of activity, established 'store & forward' applications under their own control, and so on.
The requirements were set high so that not just anyone could "slap a PC into their basement " and claim VAN status.
Unfortunately, as EDI demands were increased and technology advancements in both hardware and communications were achieved, it seems that you could "slap a PC anywhere" and claim VAN as your business. Foolish enough as it seems, some Tier 1's accepted VAN status claims from these small service centers and began to provide interconnects with them. This is not only a violation of the intent of the original Interconnect Agreements, but had resulted in lessened security, more "lost data" and similar problems because many new VANs simply could not manage nor see the reason to create services like mailbag capabilities in the first place.
We now have a whole series of players in the VAN world who actually are merely resellers of some of the old Tier 1 VAN services, yet claim pure VAN status.
The North American list of Tier 1 VANs consisted of GEIS, Sterling/Commerce, IBM/Advantis, MCI; Traderoute; Commport; AT&T and few others. Most are still around under new names perhaps, whereas others have merely been gobbled up in a consolidation of the business.
Part of the issue with EDI is now the proliferation of wannabe VANs who just cannot deliver the services.
Glen Haywood General Manager, Sales Commport Communications Int'l, inc. (905) 727-6782 ext.2206 glenh@c... http://www.commport.com/
-----Original Message----- From: Stephen Lee [mailto:lees5@b...] Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 10:33 AM To: EDI-L@y... Subject: RE: [EDI-L] <Misc> Current Matrix of VANS
Glen, What and who defines a Tier 1 VAN?
Thanks, -Steve
"Glen Haywood" To: leem, "'Michael Josiah'", EDI-L <GlenH@C...> cc: Subject: RE: [EDI-L] <Misc> Current Matrix of VANS 03/22/2005 10:29 AM Please respond to glenh
Lee,
While the EDI directory is a useful tool, some of the information can be misleading. Case in point, there are 12 companies listed as VAN's whereby only 3 of them are recognized as a Tier 1 VAN. There should be a screening process prohibiting certain companies that sell themselves off as a VAN as Stephen Lee has pointed out. The listing process only allows for a company to list under 6 categories. Any full service company like Commport has difficulty pigeon holeing themselves into such narrowly defined categories.
BTW, Commport Communications is a recognized Tier 1 VAN and I am the POC.
Glen Haywood General Manager, Sales Commport Communications Int'l, inc. (905) 727-6782 ext.2206 glenh@c... http://www.commport.com/
-----Original Message----- From: Lee Mrkonjic [mailto:leem@e...] Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 5:35 PM To: 'Michael Josiah'; EDI-L@y... Subject: RE: [EDI-L] <Misc> Current Matrix of VANS
Michael,
You will find a comprehensive list in the EDI Vendor Directory. Visit http://www.edidirectory.com/.
Regards, Lee Mrkonjic
Publisher - EDI Vendor Directory 416.657.4426 416.391.0865 (fax) http://www.edidirectory.com/ http://www.vantagepoint.ca/
>-----Original Message----- >From: Michael Josiah [mailto:ny_ediguy@y...] >Sent: March 21, 2005 5:04 PM >To: EDI-L@y... >Subject: [EDI-L] <Misc> Current Matrix of VANS > > > >Perhaps someone in the EDI List world has put together a >document of current POC's for the active VANS. > >I contacted Sears the other day, and when I asked about the >VAN was told that they are now using "G International" >formually known as IBM. That was news to me. Who is "G >International?" > >What other recent surprises are there? I know that a few >months ago Inovis acquired QRS. What else is going on in the >ever changing world of VANS? If someone has a current Matrix >of this and/or a migration list of who has been aquired, I >would appreciate it. > >Thanks in Advance, > >Shalom, > >Michael Josiah > > > > > >__________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >http://mail.yahoo.com > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > >. >Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject >prefix: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, ><OFF-TOPIC> Access the list online at: >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > >
. Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC> Access the list online at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L
Yahoo! Groups Links
. Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC> Access the list online at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L
Yahoo! Groups Links
. Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC> Access the list online at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L
Yahoo! Groups Links
. Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC> Access the list online at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=129ba27i0/M=298184.6191685.7192823.3001176/D=groups/S=1705005582:HM/EXP=1111601870/A=2593423/R=0/SIG=11el9gslf/*http://www.netflix.com/Default?mqso=60190075
Yahoo! Groups Links
- To visit your group on the web, go to:
- http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/
-
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
- EDI-L-unsubscribe@y...
-
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/.
. Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC> Access the list online at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L
|
|
Subscribe in XML format
| RSS 2.0 |
|
| Atom 0.3 |
|
|