|
[EDI-L Mailing List Archive Home]
[Message List]
[Reply To This Message]
Re: GIS for Windows vs Gentran 400
Ron,
GIS focuses more on a flow than hard data translation. The EDI 400 product is
the translation piece. In a strange way this would be like comparing WebMethods
to Gentran for Windows.
I can not recall what version of mapper the 400 runs but if it is unified with
the Unix and NT with AI then they should function somewhat the same. The
previous statement pertains to the mapping function itself, not the product
overall.
John
Ron Katz < wrote:
Had anyone worked with Gentran Integrated Suite for Windows and also
Gentran's AS/400 product?
Other than the database issue, I was wondering if the 2 products
functioned similar.
Thanks.
Ron Katz
ENTRACK Inc.
401-334-2463
.
Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>,
<JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC>
Access the list online at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
 |
Subscribe in XML format
| RSS 2.0 |
|
| Atom 0.3 |
|
|
Cart
