Debbie
Another way would be to check the control numbers on the received documents. I
do this if I suspect that there was some kind of outage or communications
problem.
If the numbers follow, then you are 100% sure that nothing is missing.
To:
From: Chris Adler <
Date sent: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 09:07:56 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: RE: [
EDI-L] EDI AS2 audits
> Your AS2 process should include an interface for monitoring those transactions
> that have been acknowledged via a positive MDN, those that are still pending
an
> MDN and those that have triggered a negative MDN or have 'expired' based on
your
> settings (number of retries, etc). If you receive a positive MDN from your
> trading partner that is proof that they received the transaction and were able
> to decrypt and verify the sender.
>
> You have no more visibility to transactions that you haven't received from a
> partner with AS2 than with a VAN. You can't know what you don't have if you
> don't have it :O). Generally speaking it should be the sending partner's
> responsibility to ensure that they have received a positive MDN back for
every
> outbound transmission.
>
> Travis Truax < wrote:
> That's what the acknowledgement is for.
>
> You tell them if they don't acknowledge your sent docs within a certain
> period, and vice versa. Or are you talking about something else?
>
> Travis-
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Weinstein, Debbie [mailto:
> Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 9:01 AM
> To:
> Subject: [
EDI-L] EDI AS2 audits
>
>
> Since the
discussion is on AS2 and VANS....
>
> We are moving more customers to AS2 from the VAN and I am concerned
> about monitoring the success of our transmissions inbound and outbound
> without robust software. Wal-mart has a website where I can verify that
> we received all data.
>
>
>
> How do most people monitor their AS2 transmissions?
>
>
>
> Debbie Weinstein
>
> EDI
Project Coordinator
>
> Organon USA
>
> e-mail:
Earl Wertheimer
http://www.spe-edi.com
Cart
