|
[EDI-L Mailing List Archive Home]
[Message List]
[Reply To This Message]
RE: 997 enveloping
Robbi (& List) --
The problem we're faced with is a trading partner who is using a third party
to do translation for them.
The third party does an FTP "get" from our system to receive the original
TS, which contains the actual
Trading Partner's receiver IDs in the ISA and GS. When the third party
sends back the 997s they put
THEIR (not the actual trading partner's) sender IDs in the 997's envelope.
So in this case, the actual Trading Partner is not sending the 997 - the 3rd
party translator is sending it,
in a sense, acting as a VAN doing on-net translation.
Can any VAN or other 3rd party translation provider representatives comment
on how you handle this situation?
Any additional comments from others ?
TIA......Frank
-----Original Message-----
From: Robbi McClane [mailto:
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 6:23 PM
To: NAPOLI, Frank
Subject: RE: [EDI-L] 997 enveloping
Yes - since the receiver of the original data being acknowledged is SENDING
the 997 they are ISA & GS Sender and the originating party is the ISA & GS
Receiver.
I'm curious to know if you have received a request for something other than
that and what the reasoning is for doing so..
-----Original Message-----
From: NAPOLI, Frank [mailto:
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 6:05 PM
To:
Subject: [EDI-L] 997 enveloping
Group --
My understanding of the enveloping for a 997 Functional Acknowledgement
is that the GS and ISA sender IDs in the 997 should be the GS and ISA
receiver IDs of the transaction set being acknowledged, and vice -versa
(the 997's receiver IDs should be the sender IDs of the set being
acknowledged).
Isn't that standard operating procedure for 997s?
Thanks for your input,
Frank Napoli
Logistics Management Institute
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Subscribe in XML format
| RSS 2.0 |
|
| Atom 0.3 |
|
|
Cart
