|
[EDI-L Mailing List Archive Home]
[Message List]
[Reply To This Message]
RE: 997 enveloping
Frank
Kleinschmidt uses the sender/receiver from the transaction sent. When we do
translation for customers we are acting as their agent. However, we can
change the ID's upon request.
There are exceptions to this rule however. We do a lot of freight bill
transactions. Some carriers ask us to send them back a 997 on invoices
going to certain customers when we deliver the freight bills, since some
companies have a habit of loosing them. For those 997's we modify the
sender/receiver or the version so that they know that it is network
generated.
Doug
Doug Anderson
Asst. VP Sales Support
Kleinschmidt Inc.
450 Lake Cook Road
Deerfield, IL 60015
847.405.7457 (office direct)
847.458.5234 (home office)
847.826.3531 (cell)
847.945.4619 (fax)
www.kleinschmidt.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NAPOLI, Frank [mailto:
> Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 8:58 AM
> To: 'Robbi McClane';
> Subject: RE: [EDI-L] 997 enveloping
>
>
> Robbi (& List) --
>
> The problem we're faced with is a trading partner who is
> using a third party
> to do translation for them.
> The third party does an FTP "get" from our system to receive
> the original
> TS, which contains the actual
> Trading Partner's receiver IDs in the ISA and GS. When the
> third party
> sends back the 997s they put
> THEIR (not the actual trading partner's) sender IDs in the
> 997's envelope.
>
> So in this case, the actual Trading Partner is not sending
> the 997 - the 3rd
> party translator is sending it,
> in a sense, acting as a VAN doing on-net translation.
>
> Can any VAN or other 3rd party translation provider
> representatives comment
> on how you handle this situation?
>
> Any additional comments from others ?
>
> TIA......Frank
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robbi McClane [mailto:
> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 6:23 PM
> To: NAPOLI, Frank
> Subject: RE: [EDI-L] 997 enveloping
>
>
> Yes - since the receiver of the original data being
> acknowledged is SENDING
> the 997 they are ISA & GS Sender and the originating party is
> the ISA & GS
> Receiver.
>
> I'm curious to know if you have received a request for
> something other than
> that and what the reasoning is for doing so..
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NAPOLI, Frank [mailto:
> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 6:05 PM
> To:
> Subject: [EDI-L] 997 enveloping
>
>
>
> Group --
>
> My understanding of the enveloping for a 997 Functional
> Acknowledgement
> is that the GS and ISA sender IDs in the 997 should be the GS and ISA
> receiver IDs of the transaction set being acknowledged, and
> vice -versa
> (the 997's receiver IDs should be the sender IDs of the set being
> acknowledged).
>
> Isn't that standard operating procedure for 997s?
>
> Thanks for your input,
>
> Frank Napoli
> Logistics Management Institute
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ---------------------~-->
> Home Selling? Try Us!
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/QrPZMC/iTmEAA/MVfIAA/OIFolB/TM
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------~->
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>
> Message Identifiers: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>,
> <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC>
> Access the list online at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
 |
Subscribe in XML format
| RSS 2.0 |
|
| Atom 0.3 |
|
|
Cart
