|
[EDI-L Mailing List Archive Home]
[Message List]
[Reply To This Message]
RE: Re: Interchage control number sequence.

Maybe I missed something in an earlier post, but the fact that this is even
being discussed by someone who is writing "EDI" software is one of the
scariest things I have seen posted.
Perhaps my reaction is appropriate since tomorrow is Halloween.
I am not trying to stifle or limit discussion mind you, but I just had to
express my shock. No replies necessary, I don't want to stoke the fires of
this particular thread.
Best wishes to you Yajun. What did you say the name of your software
product was?....
-----Original Message-----
From: yliuaaa [mailto:
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 11:52 AM
To:
Subject: [EDI-L] Re: Interchage control number sequence.
Do you mean that the control number at GS level has also to be
sequential per TP?
--Yajun
--- In EDI-L@y..., "Tyson, Richard" <richard.tyson@a...> wrote:
> I disagree. In a production environment a trading partner would
expect
> sequential control numbers for EDI data.
> The trading partner could "turn off" the sequential control number
checking.
> But you loose the robustness of the control number architecture.
As far as
> as the TP is concerned if you send a PO with a control number of 12
at the
> GS level, the next control number should be 13.
>
> Richard Tyson
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ron Katz [mailto:rkc@e...]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 10:08 PM
> To: 'yliuaaa'; EDI-L@y...
> Subject: RE: [EDI-L] Interchage control number sequence.
>
>
> It is a problem if your trading partner is checking for missing
control
> numbers.
>
> Ron Katz
> RK Consulting Inc.
> 401-334-2463
> rkc@e...
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: yliuaaa [mailto:yliuaaa@y...]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 7:56 PM
> To: EDI-L@y...
> Subject: [EDI-L] Interchage control number sequence.
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm developing an edi software that builds interchanges and then
send
> them to VAN using EDIINT. When an interchange is built, is it
> necessary the control numbers have to be in sequence when they
arrive
> at trading parterners?
>
> What am I doing here is the following:
>
> I first have one process which builds interchanges. The control
> numbers of the interchanges are in sequence for the same trading
> partners. Then I have another process, which pick up those
> interchange files and send them to VAN in random order, so the
> documents arrive at trading partners would not be necessary in
> sequence. Is that a problem for X12 and/or Edifact?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --Yajun
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> EDI-L-unsubscribe@y...
> Message Identifiers: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>,
<EVENT>,
> <OFF-TOPIC>
> Access the list online at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=237459.2482214.3917349.2146399/D=egroupweb/S=17
050055
>
82:HM/A=1267611/R=0/*http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/N2524.Yahoo/B10716
50;sz=
> 300x250;ord=1035947291092923?>
>
> <http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?
M=237459.2482214.3917349.2146399/D=egroupmai
> l/S=:HM/A=1267611/rand=396484969>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> EDI-L-unsubscribe@y...
> Message Identifiers: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>,
<EVENT>,
> <OFF-TOPIC>
> Access the list online at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Message Identifiers: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>,
<OFF-TOPIC>
Access the list online at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
|
Subscribe in XML format
| RSS 2.0 |
|
| Atom 0.3 |
|
|