|
[EDI-L Mailing List Archive Home]
[Message List]
[Reply To This Message]
Re: X12 vs: XML File Sizes
XML isn't a pig; it's a free-form data transfer application. It's X12
one better in the wild, wild west. The structures can be as simple or
complicated as you want to make them, and the tag names can be as long
or short as you can tolerate. I won't provide an example unless pushed.
So far, xml structures have nuked the GSTPA initiative, threatened to
kill OMGEO and have caused SWIFT to speak very quietly about their
announced conversion in two years.
OLIVOLA Peter wrote:
> No matter how you slice it, David, XML is a pig compared to X12. I take
> your other comments to be less than subtle marketing. They certainly aren't
> responsive to anything I posted.
>
> Peter G. Olivola
> Effective Data, Inc.
> 1515 E. Woodfield Rd.
> Suite 770
> Schaumburg IL 60173
> 847 969 9300
> 708 829 3185 (cell)
> 847 969 9350 (fax)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Frenkel [mailto:
> Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 3:21 PM
> To:
> Subject: RE: [EDI-L] X12 vs: XML File Sizes
>
> Peter,
> There are a number of tools on the market including ours to help build
> XML schemas according to various implementations. There are also
> products like ours that help integrating between X12 and XML. Lastly
> there are also compression products that can help diminish band width
> issues.
> The big issue is which XML implementation or 'standard' you are going to
> use.
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>
> Message Identifiers: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>,
<OFF-TOPIC>
> Access the list online at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
--
%%%%%%%%%%%%% cut here %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Brian Lehrhoff (
EDI Consultant
Bank of New York
201-913-4506
%%%%%%%%%%%%% cut here %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
 |
Subscribe in XML format
| RSS 2.0 |
|
| Atom 0.3 |
|
|
Cart
