|
[EDI-L Mailing List Archive Home]
[Message List]
[Reply To This Message]
RE: X12 vs: XML File Sizes
Try to keep up with the conversation, Brian. The issue is X12 vs. XML data
volume. In that context XML qualifies as a serious porker.
Peter G. Olivola
Effective Data, Inc.
1515 E. Woodfield Rd.
Suite 770
Schaumburg IL 60173
847 969 9300
708 829 3185 (cell)
847 969 9350 (fax)
-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Lehrhoff [mailto:
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 4:35 PM
To: OLIVOLA Peter
Cc:
Subject: Re: [EDI-L] X12 vs: XML File Sizes
XML isn't a pig; it's a free-form data transfer application. It's X12
one better in the wild, wild west. The structures can be as simple or
complicated as you want to make them, and the tag names can be as long
or short as you can tolerate. I won't provide an example unless pushed.
So far, xml structures have nuked the GSTPA initiative, threatened to
kill OMGEO and have caused SWIFT to speak very quietly about their
announced conversion in two years.
|
|
Subscribe in XML format
| RSS 2.0 |
|
| Atom 0.3 |
|
|
Cart
