[EDI-L Mailing List Archive Home] [Message List] [Reply To This Message]

Re: X12 vs: XML File Sizes

From: stanley pool <stanpool1227@...>
Date: Sat Dec 21, 2002  5:11 pm
Subject: Re: [EDI-L] X12 vs: XML File Sizes
EDI is primarily an Application-to-Application
interface. It was not intended for human readability.


Cheers,

Stanley Pool
Spool Consulting L.L.C.

--- Michael Mattias < wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Chessman" < > To: < > Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 5:17 PM
> Subject: RE: [EDI-L] X12 vs: XML File Sizes
>
>
> > Focusing for a moment on the size issue (having
> strayed into more
> > philosophical territory on my last note), the
> answer to the ratio is simple..
>
> Let's not forget the ANSI and EDIFACT EDI standards
> were developed in the days when 300-baud modems were
> king and connection time
> quite expensive. Of course ANSI EDI data format uses
> less bandwidth: that was a primary technical design
> consideration.
>
>
> Michael Mattias
> Tal Systems, Inc.
> Racine WI
> >
>
>
>
>


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com



 
EDI to XML Mapping for EDIFACT/X12 Convert EDIFACT/X12 Schemas to XML Schema Legacy Data Conversion Tools Access Relational Data as XML Visual XSLT and XQuery Mapping Tools Simplify EDI Data Integration with Stylus Studio XML Enterprise Suite - Free Download!
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2007 All Rights Reserved.