[EDI-L Mailing List Archive Home] [Message List] [Reply To This Message]

RE: X12 vs: XML File Sizes

From: OLIVOLA Peter <polivola@...>
Date: Mon Dec 23, 2002  1:12 pm
Subject: RE: [EDI-L] X12 vs: XML File Sizes
I like apples and apple pie, but yours is an apples and oranges comment. No
one's comparing an 850 to an 837. Oh, wait, you dropped that in to try to
obfuscate the issue some more. How about the XML equivalent to an 837? I
suppose you'd argue that was svelte, eh. Better yet, try responding to the
actual issue raised instead of your own agenda. You're certainly free to
bring up anything you like in your own thread.

Peter G. Olivola
Effective Data, Inc.
1515 E. Woodfield Rd.
Suite 770
Schaumburg IL 60173
847 969 9300
708 829 3185 (cell)
847 969 9350 (fax)

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Lehrhoff [mailto: Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 5:27 PM
To: OLIVOLA Peter
Cc: Subject: Re: [EDI-L] X12 vs: XML File Sizes

Apple pie tastes as good as apples; apple pie is larger than apples and
weighs more than apples.

X12, because of it's implied data structure, is leaner and meaner than
XML. Doh! HIPPA is a porker too, compared to traditional
wholesale/distribution EDI. I can name that 850 in six or seven
segments. I'll wait while you attempt to stuff a minimum-filled 837.



 
EDI to XML Mapping for EDIFACT/X12 Convert EDIFACT/X12 Schemas to XML Schema Legacy Data Conversion Tools Access Relational Data as XML Visual XSLT and XQuery Mapping Tools Simplify EDI Data Integration with Stylus Studio XML Enterprise Suite - Free Download!
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2007 All Rights Reserved.