|
[EDI-L Mailing List Archive Home]
[Message List]
[Reply To This Message]
Re: translators
We have one proprietary document that we run through Gentran. Based on
that (limited) experience and what I know of Mercator, I'd look more at
Mercator. At my last job it was used extensively for app to app (non-EDI)
interfaces and got good marks. The only reason that it wasn't chosen as an
EDI translator is Mercator's pricing, which was very steep for a company
that already had their product in-house.
----- Forwarded by Paul Johnson/VH/RO_Notes on 10/19/2001 09:17 AM -----
Mike Rawlins
<mike@rawlinsecconsu To: "Drew"
<
lting.com> cc:
Subject: Re: [EDI-L]
translators
10/17/2001 03:52 PM
Please respond to
mike
At Wednesday, 17 October 2001, "Drew" < wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>I'm at the beginning of converting a legacy EDI over to a JDE/(insert
>NT package here).
>
>The 3 on NT I am considering:
>
>Gentran
>Peregrine
>Mercator
>
>I am looking for a perfect fit with Gentran in the lead. We do a lot
>of 811, 272, and proprietary documents. Gentran's ability to do
>application to application mapping would come in handy here.
I know first-hand that Peregrine also does application-to-application
mapping. I also hear that a2a is one of Mercator's great strengths.
Can't offer you much more advice without knowing what other factors
are important to you. Care to offer us anything else?
-------------------------------------
Mike Rawlins, Rawlins EC Consulting
www.rawlinsecconsulting.com
=end of email===
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Message Identifiers: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>,
<PRODUCT>
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
|
Subscribe in XML format
| RSS 2.0 |
|
| Atom 0.3 |
|
|
Cart
