|
[EDI-L Mailing List Archive Home]
[Message List]
[Reply To This Message]
Re: Winn-Dixie AS2
Greg
I am confused. You state that "Current Winn-Dixie Trading Partners may
certainly continue to use their VAN, and are under no obligation to switch
to ICC. Trading Partners who prefer this alternative should choose Option 2
on the alternatives letter and fax that selection before the April 30
deadline as requested." Yet option 2 requires the trading partner to become
an ICC customer and pay higher rates then if they connected directly to ICC.
Option one, of course, is also signing up for ICC services. It does not
mention AS2, but does mention that the trading partner will be picking up
the Winn-Dixie charges in addition to their charges on ICC.
Am I understanding this correctly?
Dwight
>From: "lovecarync" <
>To:
>Subject: [EDI-L] Winn-Dixie AS2
>Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 00:17:28 -0000
>
>In consultation with Ann Stuckey, EDI Manager at Winn-Dixie, this
>message is being posted. My name is Gregg Lanni and I am the
>Director of Technical Sales at ICC, Winn-Dixie's EDI provider.
>
>There have been several confusing posts on this board concerning Winn-
>Dixie's recently announced Trading Partner Program.
>
>The first issue concerns AS2. Winn-Dixie has implemented AS2 on a
>very small scale. Winn-Dixie is not currently offering a direct AS2
>option to additional Trading Partners. This has lead to confusion in
>regard to AS2. Those companies that have adopted AS2 as a standard
>may send AS2 documents to ICC, ICC will accept these documents and
>forward them to Winn-Dixie. Winn-Dixie Trading Partners interested
>in using AS2 in this fashion should select Option 1 on the
>alternatives letter and fax that selection before the April 30
>deadline as requested.
>
>The second issue concerns the use of Value Added Networks other than
>ICC. Current Winn-Dixie Trading Partners may certainly continue to
>use their VAN, and are under no obligation to switch to ICC. Trading
>Partners who prefer this alternative should choose Option 2 on the
>alternatives letter and fax that selection before the April 30
>deadline as requested. Please note that neither Winn-Dixie nor ICC
>has any agreements with other VANs concerning the billing associated
>with Option 2 of their Trading Partner program.
>
>The third issue concerns the use of the ICC.CATALOG. Winn-Dixie is
>not yet in production with this product. They will notify all their
>Trading Partners as this phase of the project approaches
>implementation. Also, please note that Winn-Dixie does not have a
>UCC.Net relationship. If this situation changes in the future they
>will contact their Trading Partners.
>
>If you have any questions about this program, please contact me at
>
>
>Thanks for the opportunity to clarify.
>
>Gregg Lanni
>ICC.NET
>
>Posted by T. Love
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
|
 |
Subscribe in XML format
| RSS 2.0 |
|
| Atom 0.3 |
|
|
Cart
