|
[EDI-L Mailing List Archive Home]
[Message List]
[Reply To This Message]
Re: 945 Transaction
Luis,
It may be that the LX segments are not unique. Note that they all are
LX|1. try incrementing them and see if that fixes it.
LouB
ylutorr wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm running out of ideas regarding a 945 transaction that failed our
translation process (Gentran Server). Below is part of what the
transaction looks like and the error message is that the second MAN
segment is not expected and is therefore ignored.
Our partner doesn't seem to be very EDI knowledgeable and I have
never mapped a 945 before. It maybe the way the LX loop is mapped.
It will be appreciated if anyone can supply me with any information
or a sample 945 transaction that I can follow and provide our
partner with the proper format.
ISA|00| |00| |ZZ|9051231231 |ZZ|123123123
|030715|1102|U|00400|000000011|0|P|>
GS|SW|1231231231|123131231|20030715|1102|00011|X|004010
ST|945|030715110
W06|J|6120||102230|491209|
N1|SF||93|SAT
G62|11|20030711
W27|P| |653|PU
G72|504|15||||||0
LX|1
MAN|AA|0003002043671
W12|CL|72|72|0|EA||VA|DUS0002-I
N9|LI|1|PIC97752
LX|1
MAN|AA|0003002043671
W12|CL|48|48|0|EA||VA|DUS0004-I
N9|LI|2|PIC97752
LX|1
MAN|AA|0003002043680
W12|CL|72|72|0|EA||VA|DUS0031-I
N9|LI|3|PIC97752
LX|1
MAN|AA|0003002043680
W12|CL|48|48|0|EA||VA|DUS0024-I
N9|LI|4|PIC97752
LX|1
MAN|AA|0003002043699
W12|CL|72|72|0|EA||VA|DUS0006-I
N9|LI|5|PIC97752
W03|312|100|Lb
SE|28|030715110
ST|945|030715110
W06|J|6124||102231|491210|
Thanks,
Luis
Intec Inc
|
 |
Subscribe in XML format
| RSS 2.0 |
|
| Atom 0.3 |
|
|
Cart
