[EDI-L Mailing List Archive Home] [Message List] [Reply To This Message]

Re: EDI Implementations - Live Data vs. Dummy Data

From: Brian Lehrhoff <blehrhof@...>
Date: Sat Jul 26, 2003  12:30 am
Subject: Re: [EDI-L] EDI Implementations - Live Data vs. Dummy Data
what peter said!

the secret is two ids - test and prod. don't give them the prod id
until you're happy with the end-to-end
test. you probably want to do a dummy (generic) test first to check
connectivity, but most partners
want live data (or an old po) to check all the rest of the good stuff -
can i cross the upc numbers,
do the orders generate, are the 810 and 856 correct when they come back
(i sent upc - you sent
your id numbers ... bad!), are the ucc128 labels accurate and can i scan
them?

of course, a well written plan and implementation guide will make the
process easier for all involved.

wrote:

>If anyone has already had to face this road block and would like to share
>the verbiage used, please send to me direct.
>
>Basically what I am looking for is the pros and cons of using dummy data
>instead of company specific data for an implementation.
>
>
>
>
>

--
%%%%%%%%%%%%% cut here %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Brian Lehrhoff ( EDI Consultant
Bank of New York
201-913-4506
%%%%%%%%%%%%% cut here %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%







 
EDI to XML Mapping for EDIFACT/X12 Convert EDIFACT/X12 Schemas to XML Schema Legacy Data Conversion Tools Access Relational Data as XML Visual XSLT and XQuery Mapping Tools Simplify EDI Data Integration with Stylus Studio XML Enterprise Suite - Free Download!
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2007 All Rights Reserved.