|
[EDI-L Mailing List Archive Home]
[Message List]
[Reply To This Message]
RE: Re: maillist for Gentran Users. Also new Inovis TLW L ist.

I have to agree, I was under the same impression.
Many of us EDI folks work with different translator products (or will be
someday need to) and ARE interested in seeing this information without the
need to subscribe to a more specific Yahoo list. Gentran IS EDI related,
and so is TLW, so I do not see the problem.
I personally find the MAINFRAME solicitations much more offensive and
irrelavant... but also know that the list is widespread, so just hit the
"Delete" key.. and that's that.
I guess in time, people tend to take unintentional "ownership" of lists? -
my thought on that is if you don't like it - "unsubscribe" - go create and
maintain your own list - and "good luck". I just ignore that sort of
whining.. it too is "irrelavant", ...as is this post. If something is not
your interest, hitting "Delete" is pretty simple.
My opinion only.... :-)
Mary
-----Original Message-----
From: ELDER, HEIKE [mailto:
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 9:45 AM
To: 'Ilia Chlaifer'; 'casest97217';
Subject: RE: [EDI-L] Re: maillist for Gentran Users. Also new Inovis TLW
L ist.
I am having the same problem getting access to the edi-gentran group. Even
after three "help" emails to yahoo in the past 6 weeks , no answer and still
no access to the group. My apologies if I'm one of the "too many questions
about Gentran", just thought this group is a venue for all EDI-related
questions.
Heike Elder
-----Original Message-----
From: Ilia Chlaifer [mailto:
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:32 AM
To: 'casest97217';
Subject: RE: [EDI-L] Re: maillist for Gentran Users. Also new Inovis TLW
L ist.
My request too took 3-4 weeks to get approved.
BTW, there is a new list of Inovis/Trusted Link users, also on Yahoo:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TLW_UG
I've just registered and it took me one minute to get approved :-)
BTW: any of you guys getting spam messages addressed to email addresses
listed in your postings to edi-l?
IC
-----Original Message-----
From: casest97217 [mailto:
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 11:22 AM
To:
Subject: [EDI-L] Re: maillist for Gentran Users
I'm getting the feeling that the admin of edi-gentran maybe loosing
interest, which is normal in many private groups. My subscription
process to edi-gentran has been pending for almost two months now and
I have basically given up on it happening. As an EDI consultant
specializing in Gentran Server for Windows NT and previous senior
consultant for Sterling Commerce, I answer a lot of Gentran related
questions for the folks in EDI-L that have them. I would love to
assist the members of edi-gentran, but until then I just hang out
here.
Stephen
--- In "Cox, Ken" <jkcedi@c...> wrote:
> Hi All,
> There is already a Yahoo maillist for Gentran/GIS users which has a
lot
> of the same subscribers as this one. I would be happy to see all
of
> the Gentran specific questions and tips addressed towards the other
> list, so that I don't have to see a lot of it twice, but for now a
lot
> of users are not on both, so users are hedging their bets in case
the
> answer may come from EDI-L instead of from edi_gentran.
>
> This is just to let those EDI-L members who are also Gentran users
know
> about the other list in case they would like to participate, thereby
> reducing the amount of Gentran clutter on EDI-L:
>
> Jeff Garwick <Jeff_Garwick@b...> wrote:
>
> >There is already discussion about Gentran Integration Suite on the
> Gentran
> >Yahoo user group list:
> >
> > <mailto:
> >
> >I suggest joining it if you are going to implement GIS.
>
> Thanks.
> Ken
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: William J. Kammerer
> To: EDI-L Listserv
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 9:52 AM
> Subject: Re: [EDI-L] Fake Applicants
>
> . . .
>
> The EDI-L listserve is losing its focus and is in danger of falling
into
> irrelevancy. This reminds me of a note I received last week from
> another subscriber on the list:
>
> Hi William,
>
> Why don't you create a Yahoo! Group for EDI-L Gentran users?
> I think it would a great contribution for those of us who
> don't give a rats ass about Gentran.
>
> Of course, I don't run any Yahoo! lists. But I certainly have to
say my
> correspondent's sentiments are probably shared by a good number of
the
> EDI-L community. And many of us are probably wondering why Sterling
> Commerce, Innovis, GXS, Cleo and all the others don't sponsor their
own
> list serves - or provide 24x7 support for their products - so the
rest
> of us don't have to be subjected to the hideous details of these
> particular products' inner-workings. This is not to say we don't
> appreciate hearing from vendors with their announcements, or even
folks'
> comparisons of B2B products.
>
> But like I said, I don't run any Yahoo! lists and I don't run this
> one - but I would encourage the list owner or administrator to apply
> some focus to the topics that will be discussed here.
>
> William J. Kammerer
> Novannet, LLC.
> Columbus, US-OH 43221-3859
> +1 (614) 487-0320
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix:
<SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC>
Access the list online at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix:
<SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC>
Access the list online at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix:
<SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC>
Access the list online at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
 |
Subscribe in XML format
| RSS 2.0 |
|
| Atom 0.3 |
|
|