|
[EDI-L Mailing List Archive Home]
[Message List]
[Reply To This Message]
Re: UCCNet Guidance - ASP - Verrrrrrryyyyyyy Interestinggggggg
This development with WWRE is very interesting. Having worked for a
UCCnet Solution Partner, one of the clauses in the contract with
UCCnet is that you will not operate a competing Data Synch service.
And this sounds exacly like what WWRE is doing for CVS. Am I missing
something? Wonder what UCCnet thinks of this?
BTW, there have been a few comments about WWRE and Transora and data
pool interoperabililty. This was a very interesting and long subject
of discussion in a meeting I was participating in at UCCnet. If
anyone is interested, I'd be happy to discuss this, but not in an
open forum.
John
--- In Scheuermann@M... wrote:
>
> Be sure that your solution supports usage of the other data
exchanges/pools
> such as Transora and WWRE among many others.
>
> If your customers are members of these pools and registry-only
members of
> UCCnet then your chosen provider must be able to send your data to
them.
>
> WWRE can send your data to UCCnet for Wal-Mart, for example, but
UCCnet
> can't send your data to WWRE. The agreements have been signed, but
the
> implementation dates are tentative depending on your information
source.
>
> I mention this because CVS expects me to use WWRE for data
synchronization,
> but I'm in production with Wal-Mart via UCCnet. I can't publish to
CVS
> through UCCnet because they are not a full member of UCCnet.
>
> In short, check out the provider's abilities carefully to meet the
future
> demands of your customers.
>
> Bob
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Earl Wertheimer [mailto:ewertheimer@c...]
> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 2:08 PM
> To:
> Subject: [EDI-L] UCCNet Guidance - ASP
>
>
> Nathan
>
> > From: "Nathan Camp" <nathanc@s...>
> > Subject: RE: UCCNet Guidance - ASP
> >
> > Speaking of UCCNet - anyone out there providing a hosted (ASP)
service
> > where clients can post and update their catalogs independently
from their
> > day-to-day EDI software and services? Kind of like the QRS 832
service.
> >
> > I'm mostly interested in providers that work for the SMB market
where XML
> > translation requirements for UCCNet exceeds internal resources'
technical
> > capabilities.
>
> Both GPC and QRS can do the synchronization with UCCNet. Both also
have
> web-
> access for small volumes that don't justify an 832.
>
> Why upload to _another_ place when GPC or QRS already have all the
data?
>
> Earl Wertheimer
> www.spe-edi.com
>
> .
> Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix:
> <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC>
> Access the list online at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L
> VENT>, <OFF-TOPIC>
> Access the list online at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
|
Subscribe in XML format
| RSS 2.0 |
|
| Atom 0.3 |
|
|
Cart
