|
[EDI-L Mailing List Archive Home]
[Message List]
[Reply To This Message]
Re: Event Date??
Earl, the DTM 'Event Date' sounds a little vague - wouldn't the supplier
be left wondering what the customer meant by 'Event Date'? How about
ITD09 (Terms Deferred Due Date)? Wouldn't that be a lot less ambiguous?
William J. Kammerer
Novannet, LLC.
Columbus, US-OH 43221-3859
+1 (614) 487-0320
----- Original Message -----
From: "Earl Wertheimer" <
To: <
Sent: Monday, 09 February, 2004 04:45 PM
Subject: Re: [EDI-L] Event Date??
Malik
> My bussiness people are expecting "Event Date" from
> EDI. Description of their Event Date is
>
> Date field used to delay invoice billing for select
> businesses and organizations. If this field is
> populated, normal invoice terms start from the date
> entered, as opposed to the ship date. (For example,
> Net 30 day terms on an order that shipped on 1/15/xx
> would normally be due on 2/15/xx. If the Event Date
> field is populated, the '30 day' terms do not start
> until the Event Date.)
>
> In which segment/element in 850 I will get this
> information?
The Dates would usually be sent in the DTM segment, with a qualifier for
'Event Date' which is 'AAH' (or one of the over 1000 qualifiers <bg>)
OR they could send it as part of the ITD segment which has the terms.
Normally, these are documented in the Trading Partner specs..
Earl Wertheimer
http://www.spe-edi.com
|
|
Subscribe in XML format
| RSS 2.0 |
|
| Atom 0.3 |
|
|
Cart
