|
[EDI-L Mailing List Archive Home]
[Message List]
[Reply To This Message]
Re: Event Date??
William
> Earl, the DTM 'Event Date' sounds a little vague - wouldn't the supplier
> be left wondering what the customer meant by 'Event Date'? How about
> ITD09 (Terms Deferred Due Date)? Wouldn't that be a lot less ambiguous?
I agree that if the Event date is in reference to the terms of payment, then
the ITD _would_ be the best place, but if it referred to some kind of Promotion
or Sale date, then the DTM would be better.. I _did_ mention both
possibilities <bg>
There are well over a thousand different date qualifiers, so I'm sure that they
can find more than one to fit 'Event'.
>As per Mervyns specs there is no event
>date. But my client (Oriental) wants that information.
If Malik is expecting to get a new piece of data from Mervyns, then my advice
is "fuggedaboudit".
Bob Ball seems to have explained it best.
Earl Wertheimer
http://www.spe-edi.com
|
|
Subscribe in XML format
| RSS 2.0 |
|
| Atom 0.3 |
|
|
Cart
